Actuaries aren’t economists

I love to tell the story of Milton Friedman’s brush with actuarial science, as he does above. (Shorter Milton: The exams were too hard.)

Today we get the cautionary tale of two economists who bollixed the AVERAGE formula in Excel. That and a couple other dubious adjustments led them to publish a paper that, while incorrect, was highly influential. (See also here. Authors’ response given here.)

I’ve reproduced the error below, taken from a Salon article:

economistsThe average should have been cells L30 to L49.

By coincidence, I recently made a similar error in a pricing model. My formula was supposed to sum the numbers in a column but failed to capture all of them.

I was corrected by a sharp peer reviewer. Why weren’t these guys?


One thought on “Actuaries aren’t economists

  1. Calum says:

    More to the point, why is our first (and often only) tool of choice something that leaves us wide open to such egregious error – notwithstanding the widely documented errors in many of the built-in functions?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: