Mandelbrot and the quant jockeys

Why didn’t people in finance pay attention to Benoit Mandelbrot?

Justin Fox’s obituary for the father of fractals talks about his contribution to finance – being a champion of the random walk and the efficient market hypothesis.

As long as quantitative finance was mostly exploratory in nature, Mandelbrot and the economists and finance professors got along fine. But as soon as the latter groups started trying to develop tools for understanding and managing risk in financial markets, there were tensions. The tool builders wanted to shoehorn market-price behavior into a bell-curve statistical model. That is, they wanted to believe that while price movements couldn’t be predicted, price volatility could. Mandelbrot thought volatility was far harder to capture than that.

Of course, ERM wrestles with that dichotomy almost daily: We try to quantify tail risk but at the same time warrant that the quantification is a bit leaky.

Advertisements
Tagged ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: